Statement of Written Observations
LADIES AND
GENTLEMEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO WHOM IT
MAY CONCERN
PRESENT
ISSUE:
STATEMENT OF WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS
REFERENCE:
CO739-6-CFDL98-4924-D
It is my pleasure to address to you to bring
your attention in a brief communication to the existence of the Empresa Peruana
de Servicios Pesqueros – EPSER; this was created by the Peruvian government
under Legislative Decree N° 53 of 20-03-81 (Annex N° 01) to fulfill a very
important Social Politics, as attending and solve the Popular Feeding of the
Peruvian people, and most of all of the poorer peoples. As the main function
was to capture, to unload, to store and commercialize hydrobiological products
to direct human consumption (Annex N° 02); for 5 [sic] that purpose this company
had to build and/or use infrastructure appropriate for the purpose, reaching 15
fish cold storage plants, 3 wholesale markets, 4 fishing terminal, 2 fishing
offices, 3 fishing complex and 1 headquarter for ADMINISTRATIVE functions; this
decentralized units was administrated by officers designated by the
headquarter, among officers were Mr. ****
La EPSEP functioned accomplishing the outlined
targets by the supreme government until the year 2002 in which according to
Legislative Decree N° 674 the company was incorporated to a privatization
process (Annex N°03) and progressively it stopped its operations until the year
2003 that was declared as COMPANY IN EXTINTION (Annex N° 6). The EMPRESA
PERUANA DE SERVICIOS PESQUEROS – EPSEP was an COMPANY of the supreme government
and as such it was also subject of TERRORIST ACTIONS as in its INFRASTRUCTURES
as in its OFFICIALS, mainly during the decades of the years 80’s and 90’s,
situations that were extremely unpleasant in national and international levels.
As preventive mesuares the company EPSEP, give
to all its officials a credential in order to, with the support of Peruvian
authorities, accomplish all their ordered functions. Mister ****, was one of many officials that managed some of the
decentralized units (DEPENDENCIES) of the company; therefore he received his
corresponding credential as all the other official, therefore the credential is
authentic, true and original, any typing mistake and/or presentation it is
exclusively due to an ADMINISTRATIVE MISTAKE and/or conservation, such
situations should not let you doubt about the originality and legitimacy of it.
Unfortunately, due to the passed time, it only
can be gather a NOTARIZED AND LEGALIZED COPY of Mr *****s’ credential, which is attached (Annex N°4) in order to be
compared and can be given credit to Mr. ****’s CREDENCIAL. Likewise,
it is attached the CERTIFIED COPY of Public Registries in which it is
registered the mentioned official as a member of the BOARD of the company ESEP,
on behalf of the workers, likewise it is
registered the conferral of POWERS to the officials detailed among which it is
CERTIFIES the designation of Mr. **** and an official of the
ESEP (Annex N° 5).
On the other hand, I informed you that the
LETTER N° 211-89-66 with date April 20th addressed to Mr. ***** is true and authentic, has some VISIBLE MISTAKES but with only
administratives mistakes it is not dissolute it legitimacy and I confirm its
content (LETTER WITHOUT NUMBER of 06-10-1998), about the particular step to
explain about the observed mistakes:
1.
Why
did you write LETTER and no OFFICIAL LETTER? It was considered LETTER because
you addressed to Mr. S**** as PERSONAL CAPACITY AND NO AS EXTERIOR
INSTITUTION; in this case it is accustomed to send the documents as LETTER
AND/OR MEMORANDUM because it is addressed to internal officials in the same
institution and OFFICIAL LETTER it is used when an INSTITUTION addresses to
ANOTHER INSTITUTION.
2.
In
relation to the date (Lima, April 20th 1998) it is clear that it is
a terrible MISTAKE of typing and/or administrative order whose author is the
SECRETARY who now refuses to sign a ACKNOWLEGMENT OF MADE MISTAKE because that
could damage her work image.
3.
In
relation to the kind of typing in COMMON, I inform you that custom and usage of
the State-Owned Companies, every management or direction of the Organic
Structure request the specific model of typing machine necessary, even more we
consider that in those years (80’s and 90´s) in Peru where only used electric
typing machines, due to the absences of computerized systems.
Without
any other particular, I hope to help in the solution and/or cleareance on the
situation of Mr. Sanchez Zapata in his capacity as EX OFFICIAL of the Empresa
Peruana de Servicios Pesqueros – EPSEP; as well as the originality and
legitimacy of his CREDENTIAL.
Sincerely,
[Illegible signature]
[Illegible signature]
________________________
*******
ID N° ****
ID N° ****
Annex N°: 1. Legislative Decree N° 53-81 of
03-20-81
2. Supreme Decree N° 03-82 of 02-25-82
3. Legislative Decree N° 674
4. Statement of Mr. Lucas Quevedo Torres
5. Grant of Authority – SUNARP
6. COMPANY IN EXTINSION – SUNARP
2. Supreme Decree N° 03-82 of 02-25-82
3. Legislative Decree N° 674
4. Statement of Mr. Lucas Quevedo Torres
5. Grant of Authority – SUNARP
6. COMPANY IN EXTINSION – SUNARP
[It appears
a wet seal where it is read:]
I certify
that: the signature in the front page corresponds to ****, IDENTIFY WITH THE ID NUMBER: *** WHO SIGNED IN MY PRESENCE, I
ATTEST. THE NOTARY DO NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY ON THE CONTENT OF THE
DOCUMENT.
LIMA, MAY
27TH OF 2015
DR. Luis Manuel Gomez Verastegui
ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
NOTARY OF LIMA
ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
NOTARY OF LIMA
[It appears
wet seal where it is read: Lima’s Notary Association. NIHIL PRIUS FIDE (In
Latin: Nothing before Faith)]
LIMA’S
NOTARY ASSOCIATION CERTIFIES THAT THE SIGNATURE AND SEALS IN THE PREVIOUS PAGE
CORRESPONDS TO THE NOTARY OF LIMA, Luis
M. Gomez Verastegui. Supporting document N° 162366. Date: May 27th
2015. This certifies Notary’s signature but not the content.
[Illegible signature] [It appears round wet
seal where it is read: Notary Association of Lima]
Percy Gonzalez-Vigil Balbuena
Vice-President
Percy Gonzalez-Vigil Balbuena
Vice-President
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario